Anonymous said: Isn't "the Orient" referring to an area in Asia? If so, wouldn't that be about as offensive as calling Greeks and Italians "Mediterranean".
I think it’s because it’s become a way to say ‘exotic’ in reference to people. I think it’s okay in reference to objects, but not people? I may be wrong.
-The Canadian One
'Orient' is from the Latin word 'Oriens', meaning 'East'. As opposed to Occident (west). It's not really any different from talking about the 'western world' and 'eastern world' - i.e., rather simplistic and a bit ridiculous (on a spherical planet 'east' and 'west' are a matter of perspective, but not actually an evil sign of evil.
Anonymous said: OK. SCENARIO. a woman removes her boobs from her chest. she lays them on the sofa. she leaves the room. a man walks in. would he be aroused by the boobs even though they're not attached to a woman? what about if she had laid her vulva on the sofa? (let's just pretend it's somehow possible in this alternate reality)
Looking at the relative popularity of the dildo and the female equivalents, i think if anything women objectify male bodies far more than vice versa.
And what do men prefer?
Given a choice, men go for as realistic a copy of a woman as is technologically possible.
Which is why if a robot that looks like
becomes affordable, I suspect most men will choose it; no rape charges (stare rape!), no domestic violence (unless the kill bit is activated, but no-one’s perfect), and no alimony.
Why spend your life trying to impress a woman, only to have her take everything, worse, to feel entitled by feminism to use you up and discard you, burn you like a tissue?
Feminism gains power because men sacrifice themselves in service to women. What would happen if men boycotted that one-sided arrangement?
No more romances. No more children, unless women were prepared to raise them without subsidies by men.
Humanity will become extinct.
At least, that’s the plot of
and frankly, i think it would be the nicest way imaginable for us to end.
Dildos exist because the structure, size, & shape of the penis, offer great physical pleasure to women.
A random pair of tits on the sofa? Like, do tits actually PHYSICALLY stimulate you as much as penises PHYSICALLY stimulate women, or is it just a psychological (i.e. “visual”) arousal?
That dildo to me is useless, in the “visual” respect.
I’m not turned on at all by looking at that dildo. But to have that dildo in my vagina, well, hell yeah. The structure provides physical pleasure.
(And for the record, I’m not judgmental at all towards those men that have been using that new “artificial vagina” thing, either.)
I think Brett is onto something to be honest and it’s an issue I’ve talked about before.
If a machine could satisfy a man’s need for companionship would he opt for a woman instead?
Barring social stigmata and the complexity of the machine… I don’t think he would. I suspect that a significant minority of men that could afford such machines *would* afford such machines.
Attention to gaming and online culture suggests that many already have in the form of everything from pornography to video game avatars.
this is such disgusting sexist shit
ya’ll are opting for artificial sex objects cause you don’t want to put up with feelings that make women human. you just want something to get you off. this is the best example of dehumanization and sexism i’ve seen in while.
So lemme get this straight.
Your argument… and feel free to correct me… but your argument is summed up thusly: ACCORDING TO THIS FEMINIST, NOT WANTING TO DATE OR HAVE SEX WITH A WOMAN IS A FORM OF OPPRESSION.
Are you fucking kidding me?
I mean Jesus Christ, next week we’ll have some dopey fucking Feminist telling us MASTURBATION is a form of domestic abuse.
No. I don’t believe they would.
"If you don’t service your woman when she demands it, whether you want to or not, it may lead to her feeling inadequate or insecure, and this is a form of abuse prosecutable by law". - Feminist backed Law CIRCA 2027.
It’s gotten that insane. She actually feels ENTITLED TO DICTATE THE MEANS BY WHICH A MAN MAY JACK OFF IN THE PRIVACY OF HIS OWN HOME AND IF HIS *REASONS* DON’T LIVE UP TO HER STANDARDS IT’S A FORM OF OPPRESSIVE MASTURBATION.
The need for companionship goes far beyond a need for a glorified recording to say nice things, I suspect that any machine that could actually fulfill it would arguably be a person in their own right. Which makes it less a substitute for companionship than… actually companionship. Anyways, that is likely a significant way off, and besides, deranged feminists are small minority of women. Assholes are a more significant minority, but… don’t date assholes.
Anyways, the way you solve the ‘humanity would go extinct’ problem is with artificial wombs. Possibly placed in the robots.
what if rain came down all at once and not in tiny raindrops
I’m imagining thousands of people being pushed violently to the ground by a single sheet of water. It’s fucking hilarious.
Now, see, that would cause a lot of distress and, I’m sure, a great deal of injury.
Wouldn’t that make it a rain of terror?